9 Trigify Alternatives I Compared in 2026

You built a signal workflow on Trigify. Someone engaged with a competitor’s post, Trigify caught it, enriched the person, and pushed a row into your CRM before lunch. Then the email arrived.

Trigify’s team joined HubSpot, and the standalone platform is shutting down. For customers on the standard notice period, account access, integrations, API calls and signal collection ended at 11:59pm BST on 22 October 2026. Accounts do not move into HubSpot.

So the question is no longer “should we switch?” It is “what replaces the part of Trigify we relied on, before the pipeline gap shows up in next month’s numbers?”

That question is harder than it sounds. Trigify did three jobs at once: it found engagement on LinkedIn and a few other networks, it enriched the people behind it, and it routed them into workflows. Most replacements do one of those jobs well and leave the other two to you.

I’ve worked in B2B SaaS marketing for years, and I’ve watched teams replace one tool with a bundle of three because nobody wrote down which job the old tool did. I don’t want you to do that here.

In this comparison I cover what each tool does, who would use it, where it breaks, what it costs a real team, and what paying users say about it.

TL;DR

• CommunityTracker if your buyers ask for help in public on Reddit, LinkedIn, Hacker News, GitHub and other communities, and you want the post, the intent score and the warm email in one place.

• Gojiberry if you want an AI agent to watch LinkedIn signals and run the outreach for a small sales team.

• PhantomBuster if a GTM engineer wants raw LinkedIn engager exports and is happy to chain the rest.

• Octolens for developer and B2B mention feeds you route through webhooks.

• Clay when signals already land in a table and the hard part is enrichment.

• Apollo when you need a contact database and sequences more than a reason to call today.

• Common Room for teams with a five figure budget who want every signal on one account record.

• Syften for a founder who wants exact alerts and will qualify every match by hand.

• Brand24 for marketing and PR teams who report on sentiment and reach.

Which Trigify alternatives monitor LinkedIn engagement?

This was the most common search that brought people to this page, so I’ll answer it first.

If “LinkedIn engagement” means the people who like or comment on a post, three tools on this list handle it: Gojiberry, PhantomBuster and Common Room. Gojiberry watches competitor engagement and people active in your space and then contacts them. PhantomBuster exports likers and commenters from posts you name. Common Room folds social and community engagement into its account records.

If it means the posts themselves, the ones where a buyer writes “we’re looking for a replacement for X”, then CommunityTracker reads those on LinkedIn and on a dozen other communities.

Two signals, then.

An engager tells you someone is paying attention. A post that names a problem tells you what they need. I’d pick the second one for a first touch every time, because the reply writes itself. But a team with a working LinkedIn engager motion should keep one engager tool, and I’ll show you where each one fits.

How I compared these Trigify alternatives

I judged each tool against the three jobs Trigify did and the work you inherit after the switch:

• Signal origin. Does the tool find a live post, an engager, a database record or a mention?

• Context. Can a rep see the post or event that made the person worth contacting?

• Next action. Does it draft a reply, send outreach, enrich, or hand off through an API?

• Cost at team size. What does the first plan that runs your workflow cost, and which meter breaks first?

• Upkeep. Which scoring rules, integrations or manual steps does your team rebuild?

Trigify alternatives at a glance

1. CommunityTracker

Trigify watched who engaged. CommunityTracker watches what people write.

That difference matters more than it looks. When a head of growth posts on Reddit asking “what are you using now that Trigify is gone?”, that post is a buying signal with the need spelled out. You don’t have to guess why they liked a post. You can read it.

CommunityTracker tracks the keywords you set (your brand, your rivals, and the problem terms your buyers use) across Reddit, LinkedIn, X, Bluesky, Hacker News, Indie Hackers, Dev.to, Stack Overflow, Product Hunt, GitHub and Slack. It scores each post for buying intent, drafts a reply, and on Pro it sends warm emails to the people behind the posts without a monthly cap.

Who would use it? A founder or a two to five person go to market team at a B2B SaaS company whose buyers ask questions in public. If your category gets discussed in r/sales, r/SaaS or Hacker News threads, this is where you’ll find the people who are already shopping.

Features

• Keyword tracking for brands, rivals and problem terms across 10+ communities

• AI intent scoring, so a “looking for a tool” post sorts above a passing mention

• Reply drafts for each post

• Warm emails to the people behind the posts (100 a month on Starter, unlimited on Pro)

• Daily alerts, with Slack delivery on Pro

• Share of voice and community intelligence on Pro and Advanced

Pricing

Plans are billed monthly, with annual billing on request. You can try Pro free for 3 days, and every new subscription comes with a 14 day money back guarantee.

Starter covers Reddit, LinkedIn, Hacker News and GitHub. X and the other platforms need Pro.

• Free: $0 for 1 keyword on Reddit, daily alerts and basic analytics.

• Starter: $39 a month for 4 keywords, 5,000 mentions, up to 100 warm emails a month and reply drafts.

• Pro: $99 a month for 10 keywords on all platforms, unlimited mentions and warm emails, AI scoring, share of voice and Slack alerts.

• Advanced: $199 a month for 20 keywords, more community intelligence searches, visibility gaps and the share of voice PDF export.

Run the keyword math before you pick. Your brand, three rivals and six problem terms make ten keywords. That fits Pro and breaks Starter.

Pros

• You start from the buyer’s own words, so your first message answers a stated need

• One plan covers discovery, scoring, reply drafts and warm email

• LinkedIn is on Starter at $39, so you don’t need the top tier to watch it

• Monthly billing caps your risk at one month

Cons

• Daily alerts on every plan, with Slack delivery from Pro.

• Partial news and web coverage.

Summary

If you replaced Trigify with an engager tool alone, you’d get attention without intent. CommunityTracker gives you intent with the context attached. It won’t publish posts or chase a thread within minutes, so if your team lives on speed, pair it with a faster alert tool. For most teams I talk to, a daily batch of scored posts is enough to book the week. See the plans.

2. Gojiberry

Gojiberry is the closest thing on this list to the Trigify experience, and then it goes one step further. It doesn’t just find the signal. It contacts the person.

You give it your website, and its agents learn your business. They watch for buying and social signals such as engagement with competitor posts, people following your company, and people active in your space. They score each prospect against your ideal customer and reach out across email and LinkedIn.

That’s appealing if you’re a founder doing sales at night.

But here’s my question. How much control do you want over the first message a prospect gets from your brand? With Trigify, a rep read the signal and decided. With Gojiberry, you can run in AI copilot mode, or you can let the agent run. I’d start in copilot mode until you trust the scoring.

Who would use it: a solo seller or a small sales team that wants LinkedIn signal outreach without building a stack. A GTM engineer who wants to own every step will feel boxed in.

Features

• Two AI agents prospecting around the clock on Pro

• Warm leads from signals and lookalikes

• Website visitor identification

• Smart lead scoring against your ideal buyer

• Email and phone waterfall enrichment across 15+ data providers

• Unified inbox and AI copilot mode

• CRM, API and MCP integrations, including HubSpot, Pipedrive and Attio

Pricing

Gojiberry has two plans and one public price.

• Pro: $99 a month for 2 AI agents and up to 1,800 prospects contacted a month, with more available.

• Custom: quote based, for more agents, more senders, a dedicated success manager and team admin.

Divide 1,800 contacts by 22 working days and you get about 82 a day. For one founder that’s plenty. For a five person team sharing one Pro plan, it’s about 16 contacts a rep a day, which is where you’ll start talking to sales about Custom.

Pros

• Signal detection, scoring, enrichment and outreach run in one product

• Setup takes minutes, not a sprint

• Public pricing you can budget against

Cons

• Signals center on LinkedIn and your website, so Reddit or Hacker News buyers stay invisible

• The 1,800 contact ceiling binds a team fast

• Handing first touch to an agent puts your brand voice at risk until you tune it

Summary

Pick Gojiberry if you want the Trigify outcome (warm LinkedIn leads) with less work than Trigify asked of you. Skip it if your team wants to approve every signal before it becomes outreach, or if your buyers talk outside LinkedIn. See how it compares in my Gojiberry alternatives breakdown.

3. PhantomBuster

PhantomBuster is a box of automations. Each “Phantom” does one job: extract the people who liked a post, export a search, find an email, visit profiles. You chain them into workflows, schedule them, and pull the output through CSV, JSON or the API.

It’s the tool a growth engineer reaches for when Trigify disappears and the brief is “rebuild the engager list by Friday.”

And it will do that. Point it at the posts you care about, run the likers and commenters export, enrich with email credits, and push the rows wherever you want.

What it won’t do is decide which posts matter. Trigify ran listening searches. PhantomBuster runs what you tell it to run. Someone on your team has to pick the posts every week.

Is Trigify better than PhantomBuster?

For LinkedIn signal based outreach, Trigify was the better finished product. It found the engagement, scored it and routed it without a human choosing posts. PhantomBuster is the better toolkit: more automations, more control, a predictable monthly bill. With Trigify gone, the real comparison is PhantomBuster against the tools that still run. If you have an engineer who enjoys building, PhantomBuster wins on flexibility. If you don’t, Gojiberry is closer to what you lost.

Features

• Phantoms for LinkedIn post engagers, searches, profiles and company pages

• Workflows that chain Phantoms on a schedule

• Email finder, AI and URL finder credits

• Unlimited CSV and JSON exports and API access on paid plans

• Up to 100 workspace members sharing one plan

Pricing

PhantomBuster doesn’t charge per seat. You pay for execution hours (how long automations run), slots (how many you keep on the dashboard) and credits.

• Start: $69 a month, or $56 billed annually, for 20 execution hours, 5 slots, 500 email credits and 10,000 AI credits.

• Grow: $159 a month, or $128 billed annually, for 80 hours, 15 slots and 2,500 email credits.

• Scale: $439 a month, or $352 billed annually, for 300 hours, 50 slots and 10,000 email credits.

There’s a 14 day trial.

The meter that breaks first is email credits. Five reps sharing Start get 100 email lookups each a month. That’s fine for research. It won’t feed a sequence.

Pros

• You control every step and every schedule

• No seat pricing, so adding a teammate costs nothing

• API and exports on every paid plan make it a clean component in a larger stack

Cons

• You choose the posts, so the “listening” part of Trigify is gone

• Automations that touch LinkedIn put the account you run them from at risk

• Phantoms break when the target site changes, and fixing them falls to you

Summary

Treat PhantomBuster as a component in the pipeline, with something upstream picking the posts. Read the LinkedIn post scraper comparison before you commit a seat’s LinkedIn account to it.

4. Octolens

Octolens is a mention feed for software companies. It watches Reddit, X, Bluesky, GitHub, YouTube, Stack Overflow, Hacker News, Dev.to and LinkedIn, and the Scale plan adds podcasts, news, the web and newsletters.

Every mention gets an AI relevance filter and tags like buying intent or complaint. Then it goes to Slack, email, the API, webhooks or the MCP server.

That last list is why GTM engineers like it. Octolens is happy being a source in your pipeline. It doesn’t try to be your sequencer.

The flip side: it isn’t one. When a mention arrives, somebody still has to find the person, enrich them and write the message. A sales leader who loved Trigify because it ended in a CRM row will find Octolens ends in a Slack ping.

Who would use it: developer relations, product marketing and demand teams at dev tool companies that already own enrichment and outreach.

Features

• Monitoring across social, developer and community platforms, plus media on Scale

• AI filtering on all mentions, with intent and sentiment tags

• Slack and email alerts with a daily brief

• API, webhooks and MCP server on every plan

• Hourly refresh on Pro, real time on Scale

Pricing

• Pro: $199 a month, or $159 billed annually, for 10 keywords and 15,000 mentions. Extra keywords cost $10 and extra mentions $0.013 each.

• Scale: $499 a month billed annually for 40 keywords and 50,000 mentions, with podcasts, news, web and newsletters. Extra mentions cost $0.01.

• Enterprise: custom, with multiple workspaces and custom AI agents.

Overage keeps flowing unless you set a cap. A month with 25,000 mentions on Pro adds 10,000 × $0.013 = $130 to the bill. Set the cap on day one.

Pros

• Source coverage that fits developer audiences

• Every plan has the API, webhooks and MCP server

• Relevance filtering keeps the Slack channel readable

Cons

• No enrichment or outreach, so the CRM row is your job

• Mention overage can surprise you in a launch month

• Pro starts at $159 even on annual billing

Summary

If you already run Clay or a sequencer, Octolens plugs in through webhooks in an afternoon. Without them, every alert becomes manual work. My Octolens review goes deeper on the scoring.

5. Clay

Clay is where signals go to become records. You bring rows in from a CRM, a CSV, a webhook or Clay’s own signals, then run enrichment waterfalls across 150+ data providers, AI research agents, scoring formulas and exports to your sequencer.

Clay is the most capable tool on this list. Most teams underestimate the work it asks for.

It can rebuild almost everything Trigify did after the signal arrived. What it doesn’t give you is the signal itself, at least not the kind Trigify had. Clay tracks job changes, promotions, new hires, company news and social signals. It doesn’t read Reddit threads asking for a tool.

And every column you add is a column someone maintains.

Who would use it: a GTM engineer or RevOps lead who owns the outbound system and has signals flowing in already.

Features

• Enrichment from 150+ providers, with waterfalls that try one source after another

• AI research agents for custom data points

• Signals on job changes, promotions, hires, company news and social

• CRM sync, HTTP API and webhooks on Growth

Pricing

Clay runs on two meters. Actions pay for work Clay does, and data credits pay for data from its marketplace. Bring your own provider keys and you skip data credits, but you still spend actions.

• Free: 500 actions and 100 data credits a month, unlimited seats.

• Launch: $185 a month, or $167 billed annually, for 15,000 actions and 2,500 data credits a month, plus phone enrichment and signals.

• Growth: $495 a month, or $446 billed annually, for 40,000 actions and 6,000 data credits, plus CRM sync, HTTP API and webhooks.

• Enterprise: custom.

There’s a 14 day trial on paid plans.

Watch the plan line if you’re leaving Trigify: webhooks and CRM sync sit on Growth. If your old Trigify workflow pushed rows into HubSpot automatically, budget for Growth, not Launch.

Pros

• Deepest enrichment and orchestration on this list

• Unlimited seats on every plan

• Bring your own keys to control data spend

Cons

• You design the tables, the scoring and the error handling

• Two meters make the bill hard to forecast

• Webhooks and CRM sync need Growth at $446 a month or more

Summary

Clay replaces Trigify’s back half. Pair it with an intent source and the system can outperform what Trigify ran. On its own, the tables sit empty. See the Clay alternatives if the two meters worry you.

6. Apollo

Apollo starts from the other end. Instead of waiting for someone to engage, you filter a B2B database of people and companies, reveal emails and phones with credits, and push them into sequences and the dialer.

It’s a complete outbound system for a small team. Search, contact, track replies, manage deals. One login.

So what’s missing? The reason. A title and company filter tells you someone fits. It doesn’t tell you they posted about a broken workflow yesterday. Trigify users switching to Apollo alone usually notice their reply rates first.

Who would use it: an SDR team that needs volume and native sequencing, ideally fed by a separate intent source.

Features

• B2B contact and company database with email and phone reveals

• Email sequences and a built in dialer

• Intent topics, call recording and CRM integrations by plan

• Credits pooled across the team, with per user caps

Pricing

Apollo bills per seat, and every seat on an account sits on the same plan.

• Free: $0 with limited credits.

• Basic: $65 a seat a month, or $49 billed annually, with 2,500 credits a seat a month.

• Professional: $99 a seat a month, or $79 billed annually, with 4,000 credits a seat a month, AI features and call recording.

• Custom: quote based, with SSO and custom volumes.

Credits reset each cycle and don’t roll over. A phone number costs more credits than an email, and the dialer burns credits by the minute, so calling teams drain the pool first.

Pros

• Database, sequences and calling in one product

• Credits pool across the team

• A free plan to test the data before you pay

Cons

• No live conversation context, so timing is a guess

• Per seat pricing scales with headcount

• Unused credits expire every cycle

Summary

I’d keep Apollo as the dialer and sequencer and spend the signal budget elsewhere. Teams already paying for Apollo seats rarely need a second database.

7. Common Room

Common Room is what Trigify might have grown into with ten times the budget. It pulls social and community engagement, job changes, website visits, product signals and Bombora intent topics onto one person and account record, then lets an AI agent research the account and draft messages.

It does a lot. I’ll come back to my usual question, though: how much of it would a five person team use?

The answer at most startups is “not $30,000 a year’s worth.”

Who would use it: a revenue org with RevOps support, a CRM it trusts, and enough signal volume across sources that stitching them by hand has become a job.

Features

• Person and account records that merge signals from many sources

• AI research, scoring and message drafting

• Social and community engagement, job change tracking and Bombora topics

• Prospector for finding new contacts

• MCP and CLI access

Pricing

• Essential: $2,500 a month billed annually, with 5 seats, up to 100,000 contacts, 5,000 AI research credits and 2,500 Prospector credits.

• Advanced and Enterprise: custom quotes.

Essential works out to $30,000 a year, or $500 a seat a month across its five seats.

Pros

• The widest set of signal types on this list, on one record

• Five seats included from the entry plan

• AI research saves the account prep that reps skip

Cons

• Annual contract at $30,000 to start

• Setup needs RevOps time and clean CRM data

• No public monthly option to test the fit

Summary

If you’re a funded team that already outgrew Trigify, Common Room is the upgrade. If you were on Trigify because it was affordable, this is not your replacement. The Common Room review breaks down the contract.

8. Syften

Syften is the quiet option. It monitors Reddit, Hacker News, Stack Exchange, Indie Hackers, GitHub, Slack communities, forums, podcasts and the public web, and it tells you when your filter matches.

For a founder with five keywords, that covers the job.

You write precise filters, such as a rival’s name plus “alternative”, and you get the matches by email or Slack. No scores you didn’t ask for. No outreach on your behalf.

Where does it break? At volume. The day you get forty matches, someone has to read forty posts, find forty people and write forty replies.

Features

• Filters with exact match control across communities and the web

• AI filtering for noisy matches on Standard

• Email alerts, Slack on Standard, webhooks and MCP on Pro

• X and YouTube monitoring as paid add ons

Pricing

• Entry: $29.95 a month for 3 community filters.

• Standard: $49.95 a month with AI filtering, more filters, a longer archive and Slack.

• Pro: $119.95 a month for 100 community filters, full archive, MCP and webhooks.

X monitoring adds $40 a month and YouTube $20. If you need both on Standard, you’re paying $109.95.

Pros

• Low entry price for precise alerts

• Filter control that keeps noise down

• Covers communities most sales tools ignore

Cons

• Qualification, enrichment and outreach are manual

• X and YouTube cost extra

• No intent scoring on Entry

Summary

Syften fits a founder with a handful of keywords and the patience to read every match. It doesn’t fit a team that needs Trigify’s routing. More in the Syften review.

9. Brand24

Brand24 is a media monitoring tool, and I want to be clear about that before you consider it as a Trigify replacement.

It collects mentions from social networks, news, blogs, reviews, video and podcasts, then measures sentiment, reach and volume. Alerts flag spikes. Reports go to your boss on a schedule.

That’s valuable work. It’s just a different job.

A rise in mentions tells marketing that something changed. It doesn’t tell a seller who to call. If your team searched for “brand24” while looking for a Trigify replacement, I suspect you were hoping for a tool that does both. Brand24 does the first one well.

Features

• Mentions across social, news, blogs, reviews, video and podcasts

• AI sentiment analysis, reach and discussion volume

• Spike alerts and scheduled reports

• API access as a paid extra

Pricing

• Individual: $249 a month, or $199 billed annually, for 3 keywords, 2,000 mentions a month, 1 user and updates every 12 hours.

• Team: $349 a month, or $299 billed annually.

• Pro: $499 a month, or $399 billed annually.

• Business: $699 a month, or $599 billed annually.

• Enterprise: from $1,499 a month.

There’s a 14 day free trial.

Compare the unit cost. Brand24 Individual works out to about 12 cents a mention ($249 ÷ 2,000). Octolens Pro on annual billing works out to about 1 cent ($159 ÷ 15,000).

Pros

• Broad media coverage, including news and podcasts

• Sentiment and reach reporting your leadership will read

• Plans for single users through enterprise

Cons

• No person level sales signals

• Individual caps you at 3 keywords and one user

• Sentiment needs checking in niche B2B contexts

Summary

Keep Brand24 if leadership wants a monthly sentiment report; the 14 day trial is enough to see if your niche gets coverage. If you also need sales signals, my Brand24 alternatives list covers tools that sit closer to sales.

What it costs to replace Trigify: two GTM scenarios

Prices on a page don’t tell you much until you put a team behind them. Here are two setups I see often.

Scenario 1: a five person outbound team

Five reps, all prospecting, all used to Trigify rows landing in the CRM each morning.

Option A: database only. Apollo Professional on monthly billing is 5 × $99 = $495 a month. You get 20,000 pooled credits a month and sequences. You lose the reason to contact anyone today.

Option B: intent plus execution. CommunityTracker Pro at $99 plus Apollo Basic on monthly billing at 5 × $65 = $325 comes to $424 a month. That’s $71 less than Option A, and your reps open each day with scored posts that name a need, then use Apollo to find the phone number and sequence the follow up.

Option C: an agent does it. One Gojiberry Pro plan at $99 a month contacts up to 1,800 prospects. Split across five reps, that’s 360 each a month, or about 16 a working day. Cheap, but you’ll hit the ceiling inside the first quarter.

Option D: one platform. Common Room Essential at $2,500 a month billed annually covers the five seats. That’s $500 a seat, about 5.9 times Option B.

My pick for this team is Option B. It keeps the two things Trigify got right (a reason to reach out, and a fast path to outreach) and it costs less than the database alone.

Scenario 2: a GTM engineer rebuilding the pipeline

One operator, rebuilding Trigify’s signal to enrichment to CRM flow from components.

• Signal: CommunityTracker Pro at $99 a month for posts that name a need.

• Engagers: PhantomBuster Start at $69 a month for 20 execution hours. Over a 4.3 week month that’s about 4.6 hours of runs a week.

• Enrichment and routing: Clay Growth at $495 a month on monthly billing, because the webhooks and CRM sync that replace Trigify’s integrations sit on Growth.

Total: $663 a month.

Could you save $310 by using Clay Launch at $185 instead? Only if you’re willing to export and import CSVs by hand. Launch gives you 2,500 data credits a month, about 113 a working day, which is enough for one operator. The missing webhooks are the problem, not the credits.

What paying users say

I’ve kept user feedback in one place. Each crop comes from a public review and the highlight marks the line I’m pointing to.

Apollo

Apollo holds a 3.1 TrustScore on Trustpilot. The complaint I’d plan around is cost once you grow past the free plan.

PhantomBuster

PhantomBuster holds a 3.4 TrustScore on Trustpilot. Praise is for what it can do. Complaints are about breakage and support.

Clay

Clay holds a 2.7 TrustScore on Trustpilot from a small set of reviews. The split is sharp: power users love it, and others lose credits they can’t explain.

Gojiberry

Gojiberry holds a 4.4 TrustScore on Trustpilot. Users praise setup speed and support. The complaint I’d watch is billing at the end of the trial.

Brand24

Reviewers on Software Advice credit Brand24’s coverage and question its sentiment in niche contexts.

Which Trigify alternative should you pick?

Start with the job you lost.

If you lost the signal, the moment a buyer showed up, pick a tool that finds intent. For LinkedIn engagers that’s Gojiberry or PhantomBuster. For buyers who write their need in public, it’s CommunityTracker.

If you lost the enrichment and routing, Clay rebuilds it, and Growth is where the integrations live.

If you lost outreach, Apollo is the execution layer.

If you never used most of Trigify and wanted reports, Brand24 or Octolens will make your dashboards happier than any sales tool.

After laying all nine side by side, here’s where I land. Don’t buy one tool to replace Trigify. Buy one tool for the signal and keep the outreach you already have. Most teams I’ve seen get further with a $99 intent feed and their existing sequencer than with a $2,500 platform they half use.

FAQ

What are the best Trigify alternatives for monitoring LinkedIn engagement?

Gojiberry and PhantomBuster both work with LinkedIn engagement. Gojiberry watches competitor engagement and people active in your space, then reaches out for you. PhantomBuster exports likers and commenters from posts you pick. If you’d rather read what buyers post than who liked what, CommunityTracker tracks LinkedIn posts that match your problem terms.

Is Trigify better than PhantomBuster?

Trigify was the more finished product for signal based outreach because it found and scored engagement without you choosing posts. PhantomBuster gives you more control and a predictable bill, but you choose what it scrapes. With Trigify retired, compare PhantomBuster against Gojiberry instead.

PhantomBuster vs Trigify for LinkedIn signal based outreach: which is closer?

For extraction, PhantomBuster matches what Trigify did. For listening and scoring, it doesn’t. If you want the full Trigify loop without building it, Gojiberry is closer. If you want to build it, pair PhantomBuster with an intent source and Clay.

Is Trigify shutting down?

Yes. The Trigify team joined HubSpot and the standalone platform is being retired. For standard customers, access, integrations, API calls and monitoring ended at 11:59pm BST on 22 October 2026, and accounts do not move into HubSpot.

Is Octolens a good Trigify alternative?

It’s a good mention source if you already own enrichment and outreach. Octolens routes scored mentions to Slack, webhooks and its API, but it doesn’t contact anyone.

Can Brand24 replace Trigify?

Not for sales. Brand24 measures mentions, sentiment and reach for marketing and PR. It doesn’t turn a mention into a person your reps can contact.